We’ve all seen it: chatbots that answer fluently in the moment but blank out on anything said yesterday. The “AI memory problem” feels deceptively simple, but solving it is messy - and we’ve been knee-deep in that mess trying to figure it out.

Where Chatbots Stand Today

Most systems still run in one of three modes:

• Stateless: Every new chat is a clean slate. Useful for quick Q&A, useless for long-term continuity.
• Extended Context Windows: Models like GPT or Claude handle huge token spans, but this isn’t memory - it’s a scrolling buffer. Once you overflow it, the past is gone.
• Built-in Vendor Memory: OpenAI and others now offer persistent memory, but it’s opaque, locked to their ecosystem, and not API-accessible.

For anyone building real products, none of these are enough.

The Memory Types We’ve Been Wrestling With

When we started experimenting with recallio.ai, we thought “just store past chats in a vector DB and recall them later.” Easy, right? Not really. It turns out memory isn’t one thing - it splits into types:

• Sequential Memory: Linear logs or summaries of what happened. Think timelines: “User asked X, system answered Y.” Simple, predictable, great for compliance. But too shallow if you need deeper understanding.
• Graph Memory: A web of entities and relationships: Alice is Bob’s manager; Bob closed deal Z last week. This is closer to how humans recall context - structured, relational, dynamic. But graph memory is technically harder: higher cost, more complexity, governance headaches.

And then there’s interpretation on top of memory - extracting facts, summarizing multiple entries, deciding what’s important enough to persist. Do you save the raw transcript, or do you distill it into “Alice is frustrated because her last support ticket was delayed”? That extra step is where things start looking less like storage and more like reasoning.

The Struggle

Our biggest realization: memory isn’t about just remembering more - it’s about remembering the right things, in the right form, for the right context. And no single approach nails it.

What looks simple at first - “just make the bot remember” - quickly unravels into tradeoffs.

• If memory is too raw, the system drowns in irrelevant logs.
• If it’s too compressed, important nuance gets lost.
• If it’s too siloed, memory lives in one app but can’t be shared across tools or agents.

It's all about finding balance between simplicity, richness, compliance, and cost. Each time we discover new edge cases where “memory” behaves very differently than expected.

The Open Question

What’s clear is that the next generation of chatbots and AI agents won’t just need memory - they’ll need governed, interpretable, context-aware memory that feels less like a database and more like a living system.

We’re still figuring out where the balance lies: timelines vs. graphs, raw logs vs. distilled insights, vendor memory vs. external APIs.

What’s clear is that the next wave of chatbots and AI agents won’t just need memory - they’ll need governed, interpretable, context-aware memory that feels less like a database and more like a living system.

Let's chat

But here’s the thing we’re still wrestling with: if you could choose, would you want your AI to remember everything, only what’s important, or something in between?